> when eye-tracking software was used to test the claim [camelCase is easier to read than under_score], two conclusions emerged: (1) developers are equally accurate regardless of style, but (2) the under_score style can be processed faster and easier.
I hadn't heard about hype for this but it's cool to see that it was put to the test.
> when eye-tracking software was used to test the claim [camelCase is easier to read than under_score], two conclusions emerged: (1) developers are equally accurate regardless of style, but (2) the under_score style can be processed faster and easier.
I hadn't heard about hype for this but it's cool to see that it was put to the test.
N.B.,
> "Subjects were historically trained mostly in the underscore identifier style and were all programmers."